Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232 (1983)
AbstractProfessor Aubert's ?three?stage rocket? (Inquiry, Vol. 26 , No. 1) has reached periodic orbit. His comments on my earlier reply to his critique of my election predictions paper simply repeat arguments I have already refuted. In this note, I limit myself largely to pointing out Professor Aubert's misconceptions of what my position actually is. I find no reasons for revising the views stated in my original election predictions paper, nor any reasons for thinking that paper violated norms of scientific method that prevail in the natural sciences
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Ii. Mathematical Modelling of Election Predictions: Comments to Simon 's Reply.Karl Egil Aubert - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):132 – 134.
The Role of Mathematics in the Exploration of Reality.Karl Egil Aubert - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):353 – 359.
Wishful Thinking and Social Inﬂuence in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.Michael K. Miller, Guanchun Wang, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni & Daniel N. Osherson - unknown
Comments on Professor Roger Buck's Paper "Reflexive Predictions.".Adolf Grünbaum - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (4):370 - 372.
Causation in Torts, Crimes, and Moral Philosophy: A Reply to Professor Thomson.Paul F. Rothstein - manuscript
"Election Tribunals, Election Petitions and Justice.Nkeonye Otakpor - 1988 - Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (3):20-30.