I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert

Abstract

Professor Aubert's ?three?stage rocket? (Inquiry, Vol. 26 [1983], No. 1) has reached periodic orbit. His comments on my earlier reply to his critique of my election predictions paper simply repeat arguments I have already refuted. In this note, I limit myself largely to pointing out Professor Aubert's misconceptions of what my position actually is. I find no reasons for revising the views stated in my original election predictions paper, nor any reasons for thinking that paper violated norms of scientific method that prevail in the natural sciences

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-05

Downloads
20 (#563,058)

6 months
2 (#259,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Final Reply to Professor Schweickart.N. Scott Arnold - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):335.
Ii. Mathematical Modelling of Election Predictions: Comments to Simon 's Reply.Karl Egil Aubert - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):132 – 134.
The Role of Mathematics in the Exploration of Reality.Karl Egil Aubert - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):353 – 359.
"Election Tribunals, Election Petitions and Justice.Nkeonye Otakpor - 1988 - Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (3):20-30.
Reflexive Predictions.Roger C. Buck - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (4):359-369.
Election Predictions: Reply.Herbert A. Simon - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):361 – 364.

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations