Logical constructivism, modal logic, and metaphysics: A reply to professor Pruss' ``professor Lucas' second epistemic way'' [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1020854101054

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Professor Lucas' second epistemic way.Alexander R. Pruss - 1999 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 45 (3):189-194.
Mechanism: A rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (April):149-51.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Lucas' number is finally up.G. Lee Bowie - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (3):279-85.
The second epistemic way.Billy Joe Lucas - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):107 - 114.
Minds, machines and Godel: A reply to mr Lucas.C. Whitely - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (January):61-62.
R. Lucas, Kurt Godel, and Fred astaire.David L. Boyer - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (April):147-59.
Professor Lucas on omniscience.Robert W. Beard - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (1):37 - 43.
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to professor beard's, 'professor Lucas on omniscience'. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#253,934)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The second epistemic way.Billy Joe Lucas - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):107 - 114.

Add more references