Representation and presentation: A reply to professor Dickie

Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):238-241 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2023037

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A defence of aesthetic experience: In reply to George Dickie.Lawrence W. Hyman - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):62-63.
A reply to professor Margolis.Review author[S.]: George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229-231.
Reply to professor Janson.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1970 - Metaphilosophy 1 (1):63–65.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Reply to Ryckman.George Dickie - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (2):177.
Reply to noël Carroll.George Dickie - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):311-312.
An earnest reply to professor Stalker.George Dickie - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):713-718.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
116 (#150,816)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references