Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice

Informal Logic 42 (4):41-55 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1970 the voting age in Canada changed from 21 to 18. Since then, there have been calls to lower it further, most commonly to age 16. Against the motion, however, it has been argued that youth may lack the ability to exercise a mature and informed vote. This paper argues against that worry and shows how restricting youth from voting on the basis of a misbelief about their abilities amounts to an epistemic injustice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisiting Epistemic Injustice in the Context of Agency.Lubomira Radoilska - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):703-706.
Against a Minimum Voting Age.Philip Cook - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):439-458.
A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice.Laura Beeby - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):479-486.
Intellectual Humility, Testimony, and Epistemic Injustice.Ian M. Church - 2021 - In Mark Alfano, Michael Patrick Lynch & Alessandra Tanesini (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Humility. New York, NY: Routledge.
Epistemic Injustice and Illness.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):172-190.
Two Concepts of Epistemic Injustice.David Coady - 2010 - Episteme 7 (2):101-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-04

Downloads
19 (#797,374)

6 months
4 (#783,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael D. Baumtrog
Toronto Metropolitan University