Hypatia 15 (2):1-17 (2000)

Abstract
This introductory essay argues that it is a mistake to represent Australian feminist philosophy as a kind of discourse theory that is “downstream” of the French post-structuralists or North American postmodernists. Starting with the local—and the specifically Australian modes of racial exclusion, in particular—and exploring some of the byways of philosophy, what we encounter is a range of ontological, ethical, and political models that allow a reconfiguration of self, community, and social change.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb00310.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Philosophy?Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari - 1991 - Columbia University Press.
An Ethics of Sexual Difference.Luce Irigaray - 1993 - Cornell University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Learning Simple Things: A Connectionist Learning Problem From Various Perspectives.Edward P. Stabler - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:424 - 441.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
506 ( #17,277 of 2,499,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,163 of 2,499,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes