Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (3):343-349 (2008)

Authors
Deborah Barnbaum
Kent State University
Abstract
‘Supererogation’ is the notion of going beyond the call of duty. The concept of supererogation has received scrutiny in ethical theory, as well as clinical bioethics. Yet, there has been little attention paid to supererogation in research ethics. Supererogation is examined in this paper from three perspectives: (1) a summary of two analyses of ‘supererogation’ in moral theory, as well as an examination as to whether acts of supererogation exist; (2) a discussion of supererogation in clinical practice, including arguments that both physicians and patients can practice acts of supererogation; (3) a discussion as to why researchers, qua researchers, are not routinely recognized to perform acts of supererogation, while at the same time the very nature of research subject participation involves supererogation. The article concludes by considering three examples of supererogation on the part of researchers, with a plea that researchers’ supererogatory actions be recognized as such
Keywords Ethical theory  Physicians  Research ethics  Research participants  Supererogation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-008-9124-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Saints and Heroes.J. O. Urmson - 1958 - In A. I. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press.
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):332-343.
Supererogation.Douglas N. Walton - 1985 - Noûs 19 (2):284-288.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research.G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Alan Wertheimer - 2009 - Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (1):67-72.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation?Gregory Mellema - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory.David Heyd - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Toward a Rule-Utilitarian Theory of Supererogation.Craig K. Ihara - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 7 (NO 1418):582-598.
God’s Moral Goodness and Supererogation.Elizabeth Drummond Young - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.
Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions.Jason Kawall - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498.
The Nature of Supererogation.M. W. Jackson - 1986 - Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (4):289-296.
Promising and Supererogation.Jason Kawall - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):389-398.
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Forced Supererogation.Shlomo Cohen - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1006-1024.
Against the Magnanimous in Medical Ethics.M. H. Kottow - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):124-128.
Virtue Theory, Ideal Observers, and the Supererogatory.Jason Kawall - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (2):179-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
28 ( #408,027 of 2,505,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes