Socrates Agonistes: The Case of the Cratylus Etymologies

Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16:63-98 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Are the long, wildly inventive etymologies in Plato’s Cratylus just some kind of joke, or does Plato himself accept them? This standard question misses the most important feature of the etymologies: they are a competitive performance, an agôn by Socrates in which he shows that he can play the game of etymologists like Cratylus better than they can themselves. Such show-off performances are a recurrent feature of Platonic dialogue: they include Socrates’ speeches on eros in the Phaedrus, his rhetorical discourse in the Menexenus, and his literary interpretation in the Protagoras. The paper compares these cases to work out the ground rules, purposes and implications of the Platonic agôn, and the Cratylus etymologies in particular.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

296 (#40,517)

6 months
20 (#55,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachel Barney
University of Toronto, St. George

Citations of this work

Platonism, Moral Nostalgia, and the “City of Pigs”.Rachel Barney - 2002 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):207-236.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references