Philosophy and history in the study of political thought

Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):101-124 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article analyzes how the relationship between philosophy and history has been conceived within the study of political thought, and how different ways of conceiving this relationship in turn have affected the definition of the subject matter as well as the choice of methods within this field. My main argument is that the ways in which we conceive this relationship is dependent on the assumptions we make about the ontological status of concepts and their meaning. I start by discussing the widespread view that philosophy and history ought to be viewed as distinct if not incompatible ways of studying political thought, and then go on to describe the view that philosophical and historical approaches should be conceived of as identical or inseparable. I end this article by suggesting that these approaches rather should be viewed as mutually constitutive for the benefit of a more coherent study of political thought.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

67 (#176,602)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Human Agency and Language.Charles Taylor - 1985 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
On Concept and Object.Gottlob Frege - 1951 - Mind 60 (238):168-180.
The Nature of Judgment.G. E. Moore - 1899 - Mind 8 (2):176-193.
The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres.Richard Rorty - 1984 - In . Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references