Fermat’s Dilemma: Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context

Foundations of Science 23 (3):559-595 (2018)

Abstract

The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. André Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-15

Downloads
14 (#738,565)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Similar books and articles

Finite Arithmetic with Infinite Descent.Yvon Gauthier - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (4):329-337.
Huygens Versus Fermat: No Clear Winner.Paul J. H. Schoemaker - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):781-782.
Huygens' Principle: A Case Against Optimality.Hans-Martin Gaertner - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):779-781.