Did Leibniz exploit infinitesimals and infinities à la rigueur or only as shorthand for quantified propositions that refer to ordinary Archimedean magnitudes? Hidé Ishiguro defends the latter position, which she reformulates in terms of Russellian logical fictions. Ishiguro does not explain how to reconcile this interpretation with Leibniz’s repeated assertions that infinitesimals violate the Archimedean property (i.e., Euclid’s Elements, V.4). We present textual evidence from Leibniz, as well as historical evidence from the early decades of the calculus, to undermine Ishiguro’s interpretation. Leibniz frequently writes that his infinitesimals are useful fictions, and we agree, but we show that it is best not to understand them as logical fictions; instead, they are better understood as pure fictions.
Keywords Leibniz  Ishiguro  infinitesimals  logical fictions  pure fictions
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/685645
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Non-Standard Analysis.Abraham Robinson - 1961 - North-Holland Publishing Co..

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Leibniz and the Ideas of Sensible Qualities.Hidé Ishiguro - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:49-63.
Logik Und Semiotik in der Philosophie von Leibniz.Hide Ishiguro - 1982 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 15 (1):195-200.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #636,293 of 2,507,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes