Modelling curiosity in decision-making

Theory and Decision 82 (1):75-91 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a model of choice with an agent that is capable of experiencing curiosity using Loewenstein’s :75–98, 1994) information gap interpretation of curiosity. We then proceed to determine the restrictions on choice behaviour implied by the model in two choice environments: no discovery—where the Decision-Maker does not have the opportunity to learn—and discovery—where she is afforded such an opportunity. These restrictions can be applied by an observer to determine if a Decision-Maker’s choices align with the model.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradoxes of pure curiosity.Neil Tennant - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (3):321-330.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.Monica Ortendahl - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):714-717.
Making climate decisions.Richard Bradley & Katie Steele - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (11):799-810.
Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
Supporting individuals in group decision-making.P. Korhonen & J. Wallenius - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (3):313-329.
Clinical judgment and bioethics: The decision making link.Richard A. Wright - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):71-91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-04

Downloads
25 (#630,588)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?