Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much discussion of decision-making processes in medicine has been patient-centred. It has been assumed that there is, most often, one patient. Less attention has been given to shared decision-making processes where two or more patients are involved. This article aims to contribute to this special area. What conditions need to be met if decision-making can be said to be shared? What is a shared decision-making process and what is a shared autonomous decision-making process? Why make the distinction? Examples are drawn from the area of new reproductive medicine and clinical genetics. Possible gender-differences in shared decision-making are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Prudent Evidenceā€Fettered Shared Decision Making.Elizabeth Libby Bogdan-Lovis & Margaret Holmes-Rovner - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):376-381.
The Concept of Negotiation in Shared Decision Making.Lars Sandman - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):236-243.
Beyond Informed Consent - Part II.Kate Jones - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (2):6.
Shared Decision Making After MacIntyre.J. Tilburt - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (2):148-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
228 (#52,740)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?