Regulating human research: IRBs from peer review to compliance bureaucracy

Stanford, California: Stanford University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book traces the historic transformation of institutional review boards (IRBs) from academic committees to compliance bureaucracies. Sarah Babb opens the black box of contemporary IRB decision-making, which is increasingly outsourced to specialized private firms.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

R852.5.B33 2020

ISBN(s)

9781503610149

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
Barriers to Research on Research Ethics Review and Conflicts of Interest.Bryn Williams-Jones, Marie-Josée Potvin, Ghislaine Mathieu & Elise Smith - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (5):14-20.
Behind Closed Doors: Irbs and the Making of Ethical Research.Laura Stark - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Experimentation on Human Subjects.Patrick Boleyn-Fitzgerald - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 410–423.
What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.
Human Subjects Research: A Handbook for Institutional Review Boards.Robert A. Greenwald - 2012 - Springer.
Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
Contrasting institutional review boards with institutional ethics committees.Leonard H. Glantz - 1984 - In Ronald E. Cranford & A. Edward Doudera (eds.), Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Health Administration Press.
The silent majority: Who speaks at IRB meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.
Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: a guide for IRB members.Dennis John Mazur - 2007 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-01

Downloads
19 (#791,096)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references