Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396 (2013)
AbstractThe federal Common Rule, which governs the conduct of research with human subjects, specifies the criteria and procedures by which Institutional Review Boards should review such research. Although there is wide agreement that IRBs, or Research Ethics Committees as they are called in most of the world, are essential to assuring that human subjects research meets common standards of ethics, IRBs have always come under considerable criticism. Some have critiqued IRBs for using important resources inefficiently, including the large amount of time researchers put into submitting applications, modifications, and reports and delaying the start of data collection within the limited time that grants and contracts provide. Others have critiqued the inconsistency of review of multi-site projects.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Who Understands? A Survey of 25 Words or Phrases Commonly Used in Proposed Clinical Research Consent Forms.William C. Waggoner & Diane M. Mayo - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (1):6.
The Silent Majority: Who Speaks at IRB Meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.
Citations of this work
Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics Commons.John Harlow, Nadir Weibel, Rasheed Al Kotob, Vincent Chan, Cinnamon Bloss, Rubi Linares-Orozco, Michelle Takemoto & Camille Nebeker - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):183-203.
Psychology, Ethics, and Research Ethics Boards.Donald Sharpe & Julie Ziemer - forthcoming - Ethics and Behavior:1-16.
Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics.Rylan Egan, Denise Stockley, Chi Yan Lam, Laura Kinderman & Alexandra S. Youmans - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (3):191-197.
Similar books and articles
What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.
Has Business Missed the Boat on Educational Reform?Donald M. Clark - 1988 - Business and Society Review 65:39-40.
Teacher Perceptions of the Goals of Effective School Reform and Their Own Role in It.Jana Kalin & Milena Valenčič Zuljan - 2007 - Educational Studies 33 (2):163-175.
Biobanking, Consent, and Certificates of Confidentiality: Does the ANPRM Muddy the Water?Brett A. Williams & Leslie E. Wolf - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):440-453.
Missed Transcendence: Forms of Truth and Failure in Shaftesbury's "Characteristics".Rudolphus N. W. M. Teeuwen - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
The Relevant Alternatives Theory and Missed Clues.T. Black - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):96 – 106.
Clinical Audit and Reform of the UK Research Ethics Review System.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
Trying to Understand the Program of Educational Reform Through Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines.Andrew Chrucky - manuscript
A Constitutional Thinking To The State-owned Property Rights Reform.Guang-hua Zhu & Xu-Dong Chen - 2005 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:102-107.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Tinkering at the Margins. [REVIEW]Marie Fox - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (3):333-344.