Por qué es antidemocrática la secesión

Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 40 (1):157-180 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

the aim of this paper is to prove that secession is inherently undemocratic. We will review the secessionist arguments: the one that starts from a wrong idea of selfgovernment and the one that starts from liberalism. then, we will oppose objections to both: defending the value of equality; rejecting internal homogeneity claims; picking up Buchanan’s classic objections; and finally, reformulating, with Habermas and Pogge, a concept of self-government in order to deduce that it is not legitimate to draw more boundaries because an ideal democracy would require to eliminate the current borders

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cosmopolitan democracy and justice: Held versus Kymlicka.Gillian Brock - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (4):325-347.
International law and morality in the theory of secession.David Copp - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (3):219-245.
La democracia negativa.Manuel Escamilla Castillo - 2020 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 36:281-302.
Terrorismo y secesión.Paul Gilbert - 1997 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):47-62.
Habermas e a retomada da social-democracia.Leno Francisco Danner - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (1).
Secession as a remedial right.Michel Seymour - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):395 – 423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
22 (#697,485)

6 months
5 (#632,346)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Nationality.David Miller - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
National self-determination.Avishai Margalit & Joseph Raz - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (9):439-461.

Add more references