Secession as a remedial right

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):395 – 423 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Allen Buchanan holds that nations do not have a general primary unilateral right to secede. However, nations could legitimately secede if there were a special right to do so, if it were the result of negotiations and, more importantly, if some previous injustice had to be repaired. According to Buchanan, the three kinds of injustice that allow for unilateral secession are: violation of human rights, unjust annexation of territories, and systematic violations of previous agreements on self-government. I agree that nations only have a general remedial right to unilateral secession. But I argue that nations also have a general primary right to self-determination not held by other cultural groups. In virtue of this general primary right, nations also have a primary right to internal self-determination. I will then argue that the "past injustices" should include a failure to comply with internal self-determination. I also want to show that this alternative version of the Remedial Right Only theory meets the constraints, imposed by Buchanan himself, upon any satisfactory institutionalization of the principles governing secession. In the end, it will appear that my own version fares much better than Buchanan's in meeting these constraints.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theories of Secession.Allen Buchanan - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):31-61.
De secessione. The Hideouts of The Catalan Way.Josep Joan Moreso - 2021 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (18):111-151.
Self-Determination and Secession: Why Nations Are Special.Ruairi Maguire - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):60-80.
Can There Be a Right to Secede?R. E. Ewin - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (273):341 - 362.
The Paradoxes of National Self-Determination.Brian Slattery - 1994 - Osgoode Hall Law Journal 32:703-33.
Secession: The Case of Quebec.Kai Nielsen - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (1):29-43.


Added to PP

174 (#115,249)

6 months
13 (#220,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michel Seymour
Université de Montréal

Citations of this work

A cosmopolitan instrumentalist theory of secession.Daniel Weltman - 2023 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):527-551.
Toward a republican theory of secession.Lluis Perez-Lozano - 2022 - Journal of Social Philosophy 53 (3):421-440.
Secession and political capacity.Kim Angell & Robert Huseby - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (7):1073-1093.
Theories of the Right of Secession: A Republican Analysis.Lluis Perez-Lozano - 2021 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (18):69-87.
La teoría (de la secesión) de la minoría permanente a la luz de la democracia deliberativa.Félix Ovejero - 2021 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 10 (18):45-68.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
National self-determination.Avishai Margalit & Joseph Raz - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (9):439-461.
.Brett Buchanan - 2008 - Suny Press.
A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination.Christopher H. Wellman - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (2):142-171.

View all 6 references / Add more references