Res Publica 12 (1):9-34 (2006)

Jonathan Wolff and Timothy Hinton have criticized a version of liberal egalitarianism, often associated with Ronald Dworkin, for promoting an account of social justice that fails to treat everyone with respect. This paper analyses Wolff’s and Hinton’s critiques, particularly with regard to how notions of self-respect and respect-standing are deployed. The paper argues that the analyses of both Wolff and Hinton display affinities with a dualist approach to social justice. A dualist approach theorizes respect as an aspect of both distributive, socioeconomic injustice and cultural injustice, rather than of the former only, which is typical of liberal egalitarianism. Nancy Fraser is widely associated with such a dualist framework, so her version is used to assess Wolff’s and Hinton’s work. The paper argues that both make use of ideals and commitments from the dualist approach to justice in their respect objection. However, despite their evident sympathy for the notion of cultural injustice, both continue to theorize respect primarily as an aspect of distributive justice. Thus, for cultural justice theorists, Wolff’s and Hinton’s critiques of Dworkinian justice may leave something to be desired
Keywords cultural justice  distributive justice  Dworkin  Fraser  Hinton  liberal egalitarianism  Rawls  recognition  respect  Wolff
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-006-0003-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Point of Equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos.Jonathan Wolff - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (2):97-122.
"Sovereign Virtue" Revisited.Ronald Dworkin - 2002 - Ethics 113 (1):106-143.
Recognition Without Ethics?Nancy Fraser - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2-3):21-42.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Inegalitarian Ethos: Incentives, Respect, and Self-Respect.Emily McTernan - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):93-111.
Disability and Justice.David Wasserman - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Enduring Injustice.Jeff Spinner-Halev - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Collapsing Categories: Fraser on Economy, Culture and Justice.Chris Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (4):409-425.
Seeing Through the Fog: Love and Injustice in "Bleak House".Joyce Kloc McClure - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):23 - 44.
Three Types of Self-Respect.David Middleton - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (1):59-76.
Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos Revisited.Jonathan Wolff - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):335-350.
Respect for Everything.David Schmidtz - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):127 - 138.
The Place of Self‐Respect in a Theory of Justice.Gerald Doppelt - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):127 – 154.


Added to PP index

Total views
71 ( #163,825 of 2,519,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes