- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to Open Peer Commentaries: On Social Harms, Big Tech, and Institutional Accountability
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):6-8 (2022)
Abstract
The authors offer their sincere thanks to all of the commentators for taking the time to comment on our work ; one of the advantages of the AJOB format is immediate feedback,...Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Access to Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.Michelle J. Bayefsky & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Likely Harms to Kidney Vendors in Regulated Organ Markets”.Julian Koplin - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (10):1-3.
A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Young People's Experiences of Participation in Clinical Trials: Reasons for Taking Part”.Malou Luchtenberg, Els Maeckelberghe, Louise Locock, Lesley Powell & A. A. Eduard Verhagen - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):10-12.
E-Cigarettes, the FDA, Public Health, and Harm Reduction: A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Larisa Svirsky, Dana Howard & Micah L. Berman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (1):1-4.
Identity and Liberalism in Public Health: A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):1-5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme® Trial ”: The Emergency Exception and Unproven/Unsatisfactory Treatment.Ken Kipnis, Nancy M. P. King & Robert M. Nelson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W49-W50.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Addressing key aspects of the peer commentaries.R. Berry & A. Eisen - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics: Ajob 2 (4).
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-05-20
Downloads
22 (#908,073)
6 months
5 (#918,198)
2022-05-20
Downloads
22 (#908,073)
6 months
5 (#918,198)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
References found in this work
A Research Ethics Framework for the Clinical Translation of Healthcare Machine Learning.Melissa D. McCradden, James A. Anderson, Elizabeth A. Stephenson, Erik Drysdale, Lauren Erdman, Anna Goldenberg & Randi Zlotnik Shaul - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):8-22.
Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room?Samia A. Hurst - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):191–202.
Emerging Paradigms for Ethical Review of Research Using Artificial Intelligence.James Shaw - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):42-44.
A Systemic Approach to the Oversight of Machine Learning Clinical Translation.Effy Vayena & Alessandro Blasimme - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):23-25.
Bridging the AI Chasm: Can EBM Address Representation and Fairness in Clinical Machine Learning?Nicole Martinez-Martin & Mildred K. Cho - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):30-32.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-4dlf6 uwo