American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15265160802715656 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research?David Wendler & Christine Grady - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
The Dirty Little Truth: We Want Them to Understand, but Not Really….Haavi Morreim - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):9 – 11.
If Children Understand Drawing Straws and Flipping Coins, Research Participants Can Understand Randomization.Jeremy Howick - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):19 – 20.
Equipoise May Be in the Eye of the Beholder.Anne Moyer & Anna H. L. Floyd - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):21 – 22.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research”.Jason Scott Robert, Mary Sunderland, Rachel A. Ankeny & Jane Maienschein - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research”.Autumn Fiester - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):W1 – W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?”.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):3-4.
What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research?David Wendler & Christine Grady - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
If Children Understand Drawing Straws and Flipping Coins, Research Participants Can Understand Randomization.Jeremy Howick - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):19 – 20.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):1-3.
Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-02-01
Total views
35 ( #327,258 of 2,517,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,891 )
2009-02-01
Total views
35 ( #327,258 of 2,517,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
