Difference in Kind: Observations on the Distinction of the Megista Gene

In Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson (eds.), Plato's "Sophist" Revisited. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 247-268 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is argued that the analysis by which the gene are differentiated in the dialogue is an exercise in studied ambiguities informed by an Eleatic logic of strict dichotomy that was the underpinning of the Sophist's method of division. By this dialectical drill, Plato shows that the metaphysics underlying the Visitor's method fails to adequately distinguish what it means to have a character from what it means to be a character, and therefore remains inadequate to track down the sophist or to distinguish him from the philosopher: Eleaticism, as critically examined by Plato, proves to be means to disguise, not to discover the sophist



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modes of Being at Sophist 255c-e.Fiona Leigh - 2012 - Phronesis 57 (1):1-28.


Added to PP

1,005 (#12,838)

6 months
119 (#29,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Ambuel
Mary Washington College

Citations of this work

No-existing beings: phantasmata in Plato.Barbara Botter - 2016 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 18:113-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references