Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
AbstractThe Sophist and Statesman are late Platonic dialogues, whose relative dates are established by their stylistic similarity to the Laws, a work that was apparently still “on the wax” at the time of Plato's death (Diogenes Laertius III.37). These dialogues are important in exhibiting Plato'sviews on method and metaphysics after he criticized his own most famous contribution to the history of philosophy, the theory of separate, immaterial forms, in the Parmenides. The Statesman also offers a transitional statement of Plato's political philosophy between the Republic and the Laws. The Sophist and Statesman show the author's increasing interest in mundane and practical knowledge. In this respect they seem more down-to-earth and Aristotelian in tone than dialogues dated to Plato's middle period like the Phaedo and the Republic. This essay will focus on method and metaphysics
Similar books and articles
New directions M. S. Lane: Method and politics in Plato's statesman (cambridge classical studies). Pp. XIII + 229. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1998. Cased, £35. Isbn: 0-521-58229-6. N. Notomi: The unity of Plato's sophist: Between the sophist and the philosopher (cambridge classical studies). Pp. XXI + 346. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1999. Cased, £45. Isbn: 0-521-63259-. [REVIEW]C. J. Rowe - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (02):490-.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Science of Philosophy: Discourse and Deception in Plato’s Sophist.Pettersson Olof - 2018 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):221-237.
References found in this work
No references found.