Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. “It takes a village to write a really good paper”: A normative framework for peer reviewing in philosophy.Samantha Copeland & Lavinia Marin - 2024 - Metaphilosophy.
    That there is a “crisis of peer review” at the moment is not in dispute, but sufficient attention has not yet been paid to the normative potential that lies in current calls for reform. In contrast to approaches to “fixing” the problems in peer review, which tend to maintain the status quo in terms of professionalising opportunities, this paper addresses the needs of philosophers and how peer‐review reform can be an opportunity to improve the academic discipline of philosophy, whereby progress (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Non-Ideal Epistemology and Vices of Attention.Neil Levy - 2024 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 32 (1):124-131.
    McKenna’s critique (rather than criticisms) of idealized approaches to epistemology is an important contribution to the literature. In this brief discussion, I set out his main concerns about more idealized approaches, within and beyond social epistemology, before turning to some issues I think he neglects. I suggest that it’s important to pay attention to the prestige hierarchy in philosophy, and to how that hierarchy can serve ideological purposes. The greater prestige of more abstract approaches plays a role in determining what (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Philosophy without peer review?Sven Ove Hansson - 2023 - Theoria 89 (3):235-238.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•