明治初年にフィロソフィーという考え方が移入されて以降、日本哲学にはいくつものドラマが生まれた。例えば漱石や鴎外のように、文学と混淆していた黎明期、西田幾多郎が『善の研究』で日本中の青年を魅了し、田邊元 や和辻哲郎が西洋の哲学者と切り結びつつ独自に思想を花ひらかせた頃、西田とはまったく異なる文体で大森荘蔵や廣松渉が哲学を語り始めた戦後...。本書によってはじめて、近代日本哲学の沃野が一望される。.

『古寺巡礼』『風土』等、流麗な文体により、かつて青年の熱狂をかきたてたことで知られる和辻哲郎。彼は同時に、日本近代が生んだ最大の体系的哲学書、『倫理学』の著者でもある。日清戦争前夜に生まれ第二次大戦後 におよんだその生と思考の軌跡は、いかなる可能性と限界とをはらむものだったのか。同時代の思想状況を参照しつつ辿る。.

師廣松哲学の「体系の軋み」を見た熊野が若きヘーゲル哲学に寄港し彷徨い、ついには「父殺し」に辿り着いたことを鮮やかに描出。同時に、廣松哲学体系の破綻を浮き彫りにする黒田晩年の静謐なる論断。.

BackgroundA brief measure of dispositional mindfulness is important for applied research on mindfulness. Although short forms of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, which measures the five aspects of mindfulness, have been developed worldwide, the validity and reliability of the Japanese version has not been examined. This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the 24-item and 15-item versions of the FFMQ in Japan, which are the most widely used versions worldwide.MethodsOnline surveys were conducted for 889 adults in Japan (...) through an online survey company using self-reported questionnaires including the FFMQ to confirm the factor structure and validity. To examine construct validity, we examined the relationship between the short form of FFMQ and mind wandering, interoceptive awareness, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, openness, neuroticism, self-compassion, depression, and anxiety, which have been theoretically or empirically shown to be related to mindfulness. In addition, 137 adults responded to the FFMQ again, after four weeks, for the test-retest reliability.ResultsThe correlated five-factor and four-factor models and the higher-order factor hierarchical model did not show sufficient goodness of fit, while the 24-item version showed acceptable fit when uncorrelated method factors loaded on by the positive and negative items were added. However, the 15-item version did not show acceptable fits for any of the models. Regarding reliability, the 24-item version showed acceptable values. In terms of the relationship between the original and the shortened version of the FFMQ, the 24-item version shared approximately 80% of the variance with the original one. In addition, although the wording effects of positive and negative items seemed to affect the correlations between the FFMQ and the other scales, the associations with related concepts were as predicted generally, supporting the construct validity of the short form of the FFMQ.ConclusionIn Japan, the 24-item version of FFMQ showed acceptable validity and reliability similar to the original version, and we recommend that the 24-item version be used. (shrink)