Results for 'stimulus-reinforcement correlation, selective discrimination learning during acquisition, pigeons'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  19
    Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons.Edward A. Wasserman - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (2):284.
  2.  25
    Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.Allan R. Wagner, Frank A. Logan & Karl Haberlandt - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2p1):171.
  3.  16
    Effects of a stimulus correlated with positive reinforcement upon discrimination learning.George J. Friedman & John G. Carlson - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):281.
  4.  48
    Learned material content and acquisition level modulate cerebral reactivation during posttraining rapid-eye-movements sleep.Axel Cleeremans - unknown
    We have previously shown that several brain areas are activated both during sequence learning at wake and during subsequent rapid-eye-movements (REM) sleep (Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 831– 836), suggesting that REM sleep participates in the reprocessing of recent memory traces in humans. However, the nature of the reprocessed information remains open. Here, we show that regional cerebral reactivation during posttraining REM sleep is not merely related to the acquisition of basic visuomotor skills during prior practice (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  16
    Control by an irrelevant stimulus in discrete-trial discrimination learning by pigeons.Vicky A. Gray & N. J. Mackintosh - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (3):193-195.
  6.  15
    Stimulus selection in human discrimination learning and transfer.Donald Robbins - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):282.
  7.  23
    Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning: An alternative interpretation.David R. Thomas, D. E. Burr & Kenneth O. Eck - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):53.
  8.  4
    Stimulus valence moderates self-learning.Parnian Jalalian, Saga Svensson, Marius Golubickis, Yadvi Sharma & C. Neil Macrae - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    Self-relevance has been demonstrated to impair instrumental learning. Compared to unfamiliar symbols associated with a friend, analogous stimuli linked with the self are learned more slowly. What is not yet understood, however, is whether this effect extends beyond arbitrary stimuli to material with intrinsically meaningful properties. Take, for example, stimulus valence an established moderator of self-bias. Does the desirability of to-be-learned material influence self-learning? Here, in conjunction with computational modelling (i.e. Reinforcement Learning Drift Diffusion Model (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  13
    Effect of different stimulus frequencies on discrimination learning with probabilistic reinforcement.Juliet Popper Shaffer - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):265.
  10.  15
    Within-subjects partial-reinforcement effects in acquisition and in later discrimination learning.Kent Henderson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):704.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11.  18
    Evidence for frustration during discrimination learning.Helen B. Daly - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):205.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  25
    Effect of spatial separation of stimulus, response, and reinforcement on selective learning in children.Wendell E. Jeffrey & Leslie B. Cohen - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):577.
  13.  18
    Effect of intertrial interval during acquisition of extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial reinforcement.David A. Grant, Lowell M. Schipper & Bruce M. Ross - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (3):203.
  14.  33
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: III. The new learning method.Salvatore C. Caronite & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):385.
  15.  55
    The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning.G. Robert Grice - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (1):1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  16.  13
    Stimulus generalization along the dimension of S+ as a function of discrimination learning with and without error.Joseph Lyons - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):95.
  17.  13
    Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning.Marvin Levine - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):331.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  18.  10
    Acquisition and transfer in pattern-vs.-component discrimination learning.W. K. Estes & B. L. Hopkins - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):322.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  16
    Irrelevant or partially correlated stimuli in discrimination learning.M. A. Jeeves & A. J. North - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (2):90.
  20.  16
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: II. Effects of discrimination training.David R. Thomas & Salvatore C. Caronite - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):402.
  21.  12
    Effects of prior discriminative stimulus and reinforcer presentation on acquisition of instrumental responding in rats.John H. Hull & James S. Myer - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (4):437-440.
  22.  17
    The acquisition of a visual discrimination habit following response to a single stimulus.G. Robert Grice - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):633.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  24
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training.David R. Thomas & Donald V. Derosa - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):260.
  24.  14
    Discrimination of the reward in learning with partial and continuous reinforcement.Stewart H. Hulse - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):227.
  25.  20
    A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus.James A. Dinsmoor - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (4):458.
  26.  13
    Probabilistic discrimination learning in the pigeon.Charles P. Shimp - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):292.
  27.  15
    Learning Words While Listening to Syllables: Electrophysiological Correlates of Statistical Learning in Children and Adults.Ana Paula Soares, Francisco-Javier Gutiérrez-Domínguez, Alexandrina Lages, Helena M. Oliveira, Margarida Vasconcelos & Luis Jiménez - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16.
    From an early age, exposure to a spoken language has allowed us to implicitly capture the structure underlying the succession of speech sounds in that language and to segment it into meaningful units. Statistical learning, the ability to pick up patterns in the sensory environment without intention or reinforcement, is thus assumed to play a central role in the acquisition of the rule-governed aspects of language, including the discovery of word boundaries in the continuous acoustic stream. Although extensive (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  8
    The India Face Set: International and Cultural Boundaries Impact Face Impressions and Perceptions of Category Membership.Anjana Lakshmi, Bernd Wittenbrink, Joshua Correll & Debbie S. Ma - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    This paper serves three specific goals. First, it reports the development of an Indian Asian face set, to serve as a free resource for psychological research. Second, it examines whether the use of pre-tested U.S.-specific norms for stimulus selection or weighting may introduce experimental confounds in studies involving non-U.S. face stimuli and/or non-U.S. participants. Specifically, it examines whether subjective impressions of the face stimuli are culturally dependent, and the extent to which these impressions reflect social stereotypes and ingroup favoritism. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  16
    Biologically primed acquisition of aversions and association of expected stimulus pairs: Two different forms of learning.Alfons Hamm - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):301-302.
    The present commentary emphasizes that the acquisition of fear always involves complex changes in several quasi-independent response systems. Stimulus-specific electrodermal response differentiation as well as the bias to overestimate the belongingness of certain stimulus pairs mainly indicates cognitive processes of selective orienting and attention. Emotion, however, also involves the activation of subcortical motivational circuits. Why certain stimuli acquire rapid access to these basic motivational systems is not explained by the expectancy bias model.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing.Benjamin Davies & Thomas Douglas - 2022 - In Jesper Ryberg & Julian V. Roberts (eds.), Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    It is often thought that traditional recidivism prediction tools used in criminal sentencing, though biased in many ways, can straightforwardly avoid one particularly pernicious type of bias: direct racial discrimination. They can avoid this by excluding race from the list of variables employed to predict recidivism. A similar approach could be taken to the design of newer, machine learning-based (ML) tools for predicting recidivism: information about race could be withheld from the ML tool during its training phase, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  11
    Three-stimulus two-choice auditory discrimination learning with blank trials.John W. Moore & Joseph Halpern - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):241.
  32.  43
    Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Harley M. Hanson - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):321.
  33.  10
    Stimulus selection and retroactive inhibition.Nina G. Schneider & John P. Houston - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):166.
  34.  62
    Words in the brain's language. PulvermÜ & Friedemann Ller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):253-279.
    If the cortex is an associative memory, strongly connected cell assemblies will form when neurons in different cortical areas are frequently active at the same time. The cortical distributions of these assemblies must be a consequence of where in the cortex correlated neuronal activity occurred during learning. An assembly can be considered a functional unit exhibiting activity states such as full activation (“ignition”) after appropriate sensory stimulation (possibly related to perception) and continuous reverberation of excitation within the assembly (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations  
  35.  23
    An experimental study of by-products of successive discrimination learning in the pigeon.John C. Damron & Kenneth R. Burstein - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (1):37-40.
  36.  24
    Discrimination learning as a function of prior relevance of a partially reinforced dimension.Fred Abraham, Isidore Gormezano & Richard Wiehe - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):242.
  37.  9
    Predicting discrimination learning from differential conditioning with amount of reinforcement as a variable.R. A. Champion & L. R. Smith - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):529.
  38.  16
    Number of common elements and consistency of reinforcement in a discrimination learning task.Robert Stanton French - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):25.
  39.  15
    Verbal discrimination learning as a function of percentage occurrence of reinforcing information (% ORI) and varying presentation rates.William R. Gamboni, Gregory R. Gaustad & Buford E. Wilson - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):256.
  40.  8
    Discrimination learning as a function of pretraining reinforcement schedules.Harold W. Stevenson & Leo A. Pirojnikoff - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  39
    The dance form of the eyes: what cognitive science can learn from art.Ralph D. Ellis - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6-7):6-7.
    Art perception offers action affordances for the self-generated movement of the eyes, the mind, and the emotions; thus some scenes are ’easy to look at', and evoke different kinds of moods depending on what kind of affordances they present for the eyes, the brain, and the action schemas that further the dynamical self-organizing patterns of activity toward which the organism tends, as reflected in its ongoing emotional life. Art can do this only because perception is active rather than passive, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  42.  11
    Discrimination learning in the T-maze based on the secondary reinforcing effects of shock termination.W. P. Bellingham, L. H. Storlien & R. J. Stebulis - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (4):327-328.
  43.  23
    Generalized extinction and secondary reinforcement in visual discrimination learning with delayed reward.G. Robert Grice & Herbert M. Goldman - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):197.
  44.  14
    Conditional discrimination learning by pigeons: The role of training paradigms.David R. Thomas & Horace Goldberg - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):256-258.
  45. When, What, and How Much to Reward in Reinforcement Learning-Based Models of Cognition.Christian P. Janssen & Wayne D. Gray - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (2):333-358.
    Reinforcement learning approaches to cognitive modeling represent task acquisition as learning to choose the sequence of steps that accomplishes the task while maximizing a reward. However, an apparently unrecognized problem for modelers is choosing when, what, and how much to reward; that is, when (the moment: end of trial, subtask, or some other interval of task performance), what (the objective function: e.g., performance time or performance accuracy), and how much (the magnitude: with binary, categorical, or continuous values). (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  46.  62
    Two-dimensional symmetric form discrimination: Fast learning, but notthat fast.Ivans Chou & Lucia M. Vaina - 1995 - Synthese 104 (1):33 - 41.
    Several authors have characterized a striking phenomenon of perceptual learning in visual discrimination tasks. This learning process is selective for the stimulus characteristics and location in the visual field. Since the human visual system exploits symmetry for object recognition we were interested in exploring how it learns to use preattentive symmetry cues for discriminating simple, meaningless, forms. In this study, similar to previous studies of perceptual learning, we asked whether the effects of practice acquired (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Same different discrimination-learning in pigeons.Rg Cook, K. Fulbright & Br Cavoto - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):482-482.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  3
    Discrimination learning and pre-delay reinforcement in 'delayed response.'.John T. Cowles - 1941 - Psychological Review 48 (3):225-234.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  18
    Effects of visual field of presentation and stimulus characteristics on visual discrimination learning.Patricia Y. LeFebvre & Sunnan K. Kubose - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (1):13-15.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  63
    Observing and conditioned reinforcement.James A. Dinsmoor - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):693.
1 — 50 / 1000