Order:
  1.  36
    How could contemporary social theory contribute to socialized epistemology?Seppo Poutanen - 2001 - Social Epistemology 15 (1):27 – 41.
    This paper will first examine the different versions of social or socialized epistemology, a field that has gathered much support among epistemologists in recent years. After the necessary classification, the paper goes on to suggest that socialized epistemology could benefit from contemporary social theory, and Derek Layder's views are presented as especially fruitful in this respect. To give grounds for this suggestion, features of Layder's theory will be contrasted with certain shortcomings in 'conservative' and 'feminist' versions of socialized epistemology.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  40
    Critical Realism and Post-structuralist Feminism: The Difficult Path to Mutual Understanding.Seppo Poutanen - 2007 - Journal of Critical Realism 6 (1):28-52.
    Tony Lawson, Sandra Harding, Drucilla K. Barker, Fabienne Peter and Julie A. Nelson have recently debated the merits and demerits of critical realism as the basis of feminist social research. Yet the dialogue is left unfinished, with no clear agreement attained. Some key features of that failure are analysed in this article. It is suggested that, despite shared support for explicitly post-positivistic stances, critical realists and post-structuralist feminists cannot gain much from a dialogue that proceeds like this one. Other modes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  15
    Critical realism and post-structuralist feminism: The difficult path to mutual understanding.Seppo Poutanen - 2007 - Journal of Critical Realism 6 (1):28-52.
    Tony Lawson, Sandra Harding, Drucilla K. Barker, Fabienne Peter and Julie A. Nelson have recently debated the merits and demerits of critical realism as the basis of feminist social research. Yet the dialogue is left unfinished, with no clear agreement attained. Some key features of that failure are analysed in this article. It is suggested that, despite shared support for explicitly post-positivistic stances, critical realists and post-structuralist feminists cannot gain much from a dialogue that proceeds like this one. Other modes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark