ABSTRACTThis paper proposes an intellectual history of the idea that the later Roman empire and, subsequently, the whole of Byzantium were less ‘free’ in comparison to the Roman Republic. Anxiety over diminished freedom recurred throughout Roman history, but only a few specific expressions of it were enshrined in modern thought as the basis on which to divide history into periods. The theorists of the Enlightenment, moreover, invented an unfree Byzantium for their own political purposes and not by examining the facts (...) about its political culture. The second part of the paper proposes that the Byzantines valorized a model of positive freedom as legal-institutional protection against arbitrary oppressive power, including against both barbarian domination and domestic abuses. In contrast to modern thought, which tends to see the imperial position as the chief threat to liberty, the Byzantines viewed it as its bulwark. Yet they too had remedies for oppressive emperors, suggesting that the otherwise well-attested invocations of freedom were not a mere rhetorical trope for them but an actionable cultural norm. (shrink)

"Michael Psellos was the 'Cicero of Byzantium,' except that his interests were more wide-ranging than those of his Roman predecessor. In addition to being a politician, poet, and writer of letters, speeches, and treatises on philosophy and rhetoric, he was an innovative historian and a practical educator who interested himself in all aspects of learning, from mathematics and medicine to theurgy. Before now, only his 'Chronographia' has been at all well known. Anthony Kaldellis has done a great service in making (...) accessible a collection of texts bearing upon personal familial relationships, of which we know so little in Byzantium. His translations read well, are accurate, and reflect Psellos' literary subtlety. His commentaries are scholarly and give vital information for the better understanding of this facet of Byzantine society." —_Antony R. Littlewood, University of Western Ontario_ “Anthony Kaldellis is a skilled and gifted translator, one of the best I have ever encountered. I am very excited that we will have access to Psellos’ two important encomia of his mother and daughter in an accurate and readable translation, so that more scholars and students will be able to read these works which offer such fascinating insights into family life in eleventh-century Byzantium. This book will be an excellent lead-off volume in the Psellos series, and make scholars anxious for the subsequent volumes to appear.” —_Alice-Mary Talbot, Director, Byzantine Studies, Dumbarton Oaks_ _Mothers and Sons, Fathers and Daughters_ makes available for the first time complete English translations from the works of Michael Psellos, a key philosopher of the Byzantine Empire. This book contains the works that Psellos wrote about his family, including a long funeral oration for his mother that features unique recollections from a childhood spent in Constantinople; a funeral oration for his young daughter Styliane, which includes a detailed description of her physical appearance and a moving account of her illness and death; a legal work pertaining to the engagement of his second, adopted, daughter; and various letters and other works that relate to the private life of this Byzantine family. (shrink)

Name der Zeitschrift: Byzantinische Zeitschrift Jahrgang: 111 Heft: 3 Seiten: 809-812.

The need to establish a definitive list of the works of Psellos, one of the most important and neglected Byzantine authors, has long been recognized, as have the difficulties facing this task. The works themselves number in the hundreds, are found in hundreds of manuscripts, and have not all been published. There is no standard system of Latin titles by which to refer to them (cf. Plutarch's Moralia). The editions themselves are sometimes inaccessible, and the secondary bibliography has been produced (...) in at least half a dozen languages. Between 1995 and 1998, and in ignorance of Moore's (M.) ongoing project, I prepared two bibliographies, one of the editions of Psellos' works and one of secondary literature, which I announced in my study of the Chronographia. I did not include publications pre-1800 and I did not actually produce a list of Psellos' works, only of their modern editions, listed under the editor's name and referring their contents to the corresponding text in the Teubner series (where available, otherwise giving the Greek title). This latter choice was a concession to the habit that prevails in our field of citing texts by the page number of the latest edition rather than by title and section or line number. This makes footnotes unhelpful (it is often unclear what kind of text is being cited), and makes them obsolete when new editions appear. Moreover, it reveals a certain lack of respect for the text as work of literature, implying that all “pages” are one undifferentiated mass of “information” that does not have a purpose, identity, or shape of its own. (shrink)