Results for ' auditory reaction times'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  18
    Auditory reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity, frequency, and rise time.Jeffrey L. Santee & David L. Kohfeld - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):393-396.
  2.  30
    Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet and jaws.S. H. Seashore & R. H. Seashore - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):342.
  3.  18
    Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.Jack Botwinick - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):348.
  4.  12
    The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times.G. Forbes - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (2):153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  46
    Effects of 24-hour sleep deprivation on rate of decrement in a 10-minute auditory reaction time task.Hans O. Lisper & Anders Kjellberg - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (2):287.
  6.  25
    Stimulus intensity effects between and within subjects in auditory reaction time: A variable criterion analysis.G. Robert Grice, Robert Nullmeyer & V. Alan Spiker - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (3):143-145.
  7.  25
    Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.
  8.  10
    Secular Slowing of Auditory Simple Reaction Time in Sweden.Guy Madison, Michael A. Woodley of Menie & Justus Sänger - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10:190223.
    There are indications that simple reaction time might have slowed in Western countries, based on both cohort- and multi-study comparisons. A possible limitation of the latter method in particular is measurement error stemming from methods variance, which results from the fact that instruments and experimental conditions change over time and between studies. We therefore set out to measure the simple auditory reaction time (SRT) of 7,081 individuals (2,997 males and 4,084 females) born in Sweden 1959-1985 (subjects were (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  39
    Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.Ira H. Bernstein, Mark H. Clark & Barry A. Edelstein - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):567.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  20
    A comparison of choreic with normal children on the basis of simple reaction times to visual and auditory stimuli.D. A. Bradshaw - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (2):184.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  30
    Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.Ira H. Bernstein & Barry A. Edelstein - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):241.
  12.  14
    Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time.David L. Kohfeld - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):88.
  13.  12
    Effect of prewarning on increase in reaction time in an auditory monitoring task.Hans O. Lisper, Lennart Melin & Per O. Sjoden - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):378.
  14.  15
    Effects of signal frequency on increase in reaction time in a 10-minute auditory monitoring task.Hans O. Lisper & Stig Ericsson - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):316.
  15.  35
    Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time.J. Richard Simon & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):272.
  16.  12
    Rejection positivity predicts trial-to-trial reaction times in an auditory selective attention task: a computational analysis of inhibitory control.Sufen Chen & Robert D. Melara - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  17.  21
    A study of reaction time using factorial design.B. Baxter - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (5):430.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  43
    Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound.David L. Kohfeld - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):251.
  19.  17
    Reaction time to onset and offset of lights and tones: Reactions toward the changed element in a two-element display.J. Richard Simon, John L. Craft & John B. Webster - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):197.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20.  6
    Age-related decrease in motor contribution to multisensory reaction times in primary school children.Areej A. Alhamdan, Melanie J. Murphy & Sheila G. Crewther - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:967081.
    Traditional measurement of multisensory facilitation in tasks such as speeded motor reaction tasks (MRT) consistently show age-related improvement during early childhood. However, the extent to which motor function increases with age and hence contribute to multisensory motor reaction times in young children has seldom been examined. Thus, we aimed to investigate the contribution of motor development to measures of multisensory (auditory, visual, and audiovisual) and visuomotor processing tasks in three young school age groups of children (n (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  8
    Factors Influencing Saccadic Reaction Time: Effect of Task Modality, Stimulus Saliency, Spatial Congruency of Stimuli, and Pupil Size.Shimpei Yamagishi & Shigeto Furukawa - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
    It is often assumed that the reaction time of a saccade toward visual and/or auditory stimuli reflects the sensitivities of our oculomotor-orienting system to stimulus saliency. Endogenous factors, as well as stimulus-related factors, would also affect the saccadic reaction time. However, it was not clear how these factors interact and to what extent visual and auditory-targeting saccades are accounted for by common mechanisms. The present study examined the effect of, and the interaction between, stimulus saliency and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  17
    Heart rate and disjunctive reaction time: The effects of discrimination requirements.Connie C. Duncan-Johnson & Michael G. Coles - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1160.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  21
    A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory.Anthony G. Greenwald - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):20.
  24.  17
    Ear Preference in a Simple Reaction-Time Task.J. Richard Simon - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):49.
  25.  8
    Temporal Characteristics of Sensory Interaction in Choice Reaction Times.Lenore K. Morrell - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):14.
  26.  24
    Effects of timing signal of simple reaction time with "non-aging" foreperiods.Marilyn Granjon, Jean Requin, Henri Durup & Guy Reynard - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):139.
  27.  19
    Group factors in simple and discriminative reaction times.R. H. Seashore, R. Starmann, W. E. Kendall & J. S. Helmick - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):346.
  28.  16
    Naming latency facilitation: An analysis of the encoding component in recognition reaction time.Kim Kirsner - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):171.
  29.  17
    Altered Inhibitory Mechanisms in Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence From Lexical Decision and Simple Reaction Time Tasks.Alban Letanneux, Jean-Luc Velay, François Viallet & Serge Pinto - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    IntroductionAlthough the motor signs of Parkinson’s disease are well defined, nonmotor symptoms, including higher-level language deficits, have also been shown to be frequent in patients with PD. In the present study, we used a lexical decision task to find out whether access to the mental lexicon is impaired in patients with PD, and whether task performance is affected by bradykinesia.Materials and MethodsParticipants were 34 nondemented patients with PD, either without medication or under optimum medication. A total of 19 age-matched control (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  10
    Talking to Cows: Reactions to Different Auditory Stimuli During Gentle Human-Animal Interactions.Annika Lange, Lisa Bauer, Andreas Futschik, Susanne Waiblinger & Stephanie Lürzel - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11:579346.
    The quality of the animal-human relationship and, consequently, the welfare of animals can be improved by gentle interactions such as stroking and talking. The perception of different stimuli during these interactions likely plays a key role in their emotional experience, but studies are scarce. During experiments, the standardization of verbal stimuli could be increased by using a recording. However, the use of a playback might influence the perception differently than ‘live’ talking, which is closer to on-farm practice. Thus, we compared (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  75
    Merging the Psychophysical Function With Response Times for Auditory Detection of One vs. Two Tones.Jennifer J. Lentz & James T. Townsend - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    The purpose of this study is to take preliminary steps to unify psychoacoustic techniques with reaction-time methodologies to address the perceptual mechanisms responsible for the detection of one vs. multiple sounds. We measured auditory redundancy gains for auditory detection of pure tones widely spaced in frequency using the tools of Systems Factorial Technology to evince the system architecture and workload capacity in two different scenarios. We adopted an experimental design in which the presence or absence of a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  12
    Temporal malleability to auditory feedback perturbation is modulated by rhythmic abilities and auditory acuity.Miriam Oschkinat, Philip Hoole, Simone Falk & Simone Dalla Bella - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:885074.
    Auditory feedback perturbation studies have indicated a link between feedback and feedforward mechanisms in speech production when participants compensate for applied shifts. In spectral perturbation studies, speakers with a higher perceptual auditory acuity typically compensate more than individuals with lower acuity. However, the reaction to feedback perturbation is unlikely to be merely a matter of perceptual acuity but also affected by the prediction and production of precise motor action. This interplay between prediction, perception, and motor execution seems (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  24
    The processing of auditory and visual recognition of self-stimuli.Susan M. Hughes & Shevon E. Nicholson - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1124-1134.
    This study examined self-recognition processing in both the auditory and visual modalities by determining how comparable hearing a recording of one’s own voice was to seeing photograph of one’s own face. We also investigated whether the simultaneous presentation of auditory and visual self-stimuli would either facilitate or inhibit self-identification. Ninety-one participants completed reaction-time tasks of self-recognition when presented with their own faces, own voices, and combinations of the two. Reaction time and errors made when responding with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  34.  18
    Visual and auditory coding in a memory matching task.Larry E. Wood - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):106.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  9
    Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatability as a function of task complexity.James Callan, Diane Klisz & Oscar A. Parsons - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1039.
  36.  35
    Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: How accurate are decision time reports?Jeff Miller, Paula Vieweg, Nicolas Kruize & Belinda McLea - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1013-1036.
    Four experiments examined how accurately participants can report the times of their own decisions. Within an auditory reaction time task, participants reported the time at which the tone was presented, they decided on the response, or the response key was pressed. Decision time reports were checked for plausibility against the actual RTs, and we compared the effects of experimental manipulations on these two measures to see whether the reported decision times showed appropriate effects. In addition, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  37.  35
    Comparison of the effect of auditory versus visual stimulation on information capacity of discrete motor responses.W. W. Breen, M. J. De Haemer & G. K. Poock - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):395.
  38.  40
    Cross-modal self-recognition: The role of visual, auditory, and olfactory primes.S. Platek - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):197-210.
    Three priming experiments were conducted to determine how information about the self from different sensory modalities/cognitive domains affects self-face recognition. Being exposed to your body odor, seeing your name, and hearing your name all facilitated self-face recognition in a reaction time task. No similar cross-modal facilitation was found among stimuli from familiar or novel individuals. The finding of a left-hand advantage for self-face recognition was replicated when no primes were presented. These data, along with other recent results suggest the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  39.  18
    The Conditioned Eyelid Reaction.H. Cason - 1922 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 5 (3):153.
  40.  20
    Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon.David Raab, Elizabeth Fehrer & Maurice Hershenson - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (3):193.
  41.  36
    Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Elizabeth Fehrer & David Raab - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (2):143.
  42.  40
    Discrimination reaction time for a 1,023-alternative task.Robert Seibel - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):215.
  43.  24
    Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency.Alfred A. Baumeister & Charles E. Joubert - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):393.
  44.  18
    Recognition reaction time for digits in consecutive and nonconsecutive memorized sets.Donald V. DeRosa & Robert E. Morin - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):472.
  45.  40
    Reaction time in focused and in divided attention.Anat Ninio & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):394.
  46.  10
    Reaction Time Data in Music Cognition: Comparison of Pilot Data From Lab, Crowdsourced, and Convenience Web Samples.James Armitage & Tuomas Eerola - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47.  18
    The reaction time to vestibular stimuli.B. Baxter & R. C. Travis - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (3):277.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  28
    Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability.Lawrence Karlin - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):185.
  49.  22
    Simple reaction time as a function of the relative frequency of the preparatory interval.Theodore P. Zahn & David Rosenthal - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):15.
  50.  21
    Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.Maurice Hershenson - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):289.
1 — 50 / 1000