Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.
    Consequence is at the heart of logic; an account of consequence, of what follows from what, offers a vital tool in the evaluation of arguments. Since philosophy itself proceeds by way of argument and inference, a clear view of what logical consequence amounts to is of central importance to the whole discipline. In this book JC Beall and Greg Restall present and defend what thay call logical pluralism, the view that there is more than one genuine deductive consequence relation, a (...)
  • Logical pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.
    Consequence is at the heart of logic; an account of consequence, of what follows from what, offers a vital tool in the evaluation of arguments. Since philosophy itself proceeds by way of argument and inference, a clear view of what logical consequence amounts to is of central importance to the whole discipline. In this book JC Beall and Greg Restall present and defend what thay call logical pluralism, the view that there is more than one genuine deductive consequence relation, a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   297 citations  
  • Logika czasu empirycznego: funktor realizacji czasowej w językach teorii fizykalnych.Marcin Tkaczyk - 2009 - Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1959 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (1):23-56.
  • Kilka uwag o zasadzie dwuwartościowości i logikach wielowartościowych.Ludwik Borkowski - 1981 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 29 (1):9-14.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Carnap's principle of tolerance, empiricism, and conventionalism.Thomas Ricketts - 1994 - In Peter Clark & Bob Hale (eds.), Reading Putnam. Blackwell. pp. 176--200.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Philosophy 56 (217):435-436.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   125 citations  
  • Defending logical pluralism.J. C. Beall & Greg Restall - 2001 - In Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches. Stanmore: Hermes. pp. 1-22.
    We are pluralists about logical consequence [1]. We hold that there is more than one sense in which arguments may be deductively valid, that these senses are equally good, and equally deserving of the name deductive validity. Our pluralism starts with our analysis of consequence. This analysis of consequence is not idiosyncratic. We agree with Richard Jeffrey, and with many other philosophers of logic about how logical consequence is to be defined. To quote Jeffrey.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations