Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Revisiting deep disagreement.Dale Turner & Larry Wright - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):25-35.
    Argument-giving reasons for a view-is our model of rational dispute resolution. Fogelin suggests that certain "deep" disagreements cannot be resolved in this way because features of their context "undercut the conditions essential to arguing" . In this paper we add some detail to Fogelin's treatment of intractable disagreements. In doing so we distinguish between his relatively modest claim that some disputes cannot be resolved through argument and his more radical claim that such disputes are beyond rational resolution. This distinction, along (...)
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • The logic of deep disagreements.Robert Fogelin - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1):3-11.
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   155 citations  
  • The Logic of Deep Disagreements.Robert Fogelin - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):3-11.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   125 citations  
  • Wittgenstein and the logic of deep disagreement.David Godden & William H. Brenner - 2010 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2:41-80.
    In “The logic of deep disagreements” (Informal Logic, 1985), Robert Fogelin claimed that there is a kind of disagreement – deep disagreement – which is, by its very nature, impervious to rational resolution. He further claimed that these two views are attributable to Wittgenstein. Following an exposition and discussion of that claim, we review and draw some lessons from existing responses in the literature to Fogelin’s claims. In the final two sections (6 and 7) we explore the role reason can, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations