Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Not yet making sense of political toleration.Peter Balint - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (3):259-264.
    Abstract A growing number of theorists have argued that toleration, at least in its traditional sense, is no longer applicable to liberal democratic political arrangements—especially if these political arrangements are conceived of as neutral. Peter Jones has tried make sense of political toleration while staying true to its more traditional (disapproval yet non-prevention) meaning. In this article, while I am sympathetic to his motivation, I argue that Jones’ attempt to make sense of political toleration is not successful. Content Type Journal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Virtue, Reason and Toleration: The Place of Toleration in Ethical & Political Philosophy.Glen Newey - 1999 - Edinburgh University Press.
    Toleration is becoming an increasingly questioned issue in modern democratic and multicultural societies and is debated within the academic disciplines of politics, history and cultural and literary studies. In this book Glen Newey systematically analyses toleration in relation to broader issues in meta-ethical theory and offers a new, rigorous philosophical theory of toleration as a virtue. A wide range of questions in ethical theory is addressed, including ethical responsibility, character and virtue, the nature of reasons for action, the acts/omissions doctrine, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Virtue, Reason and Toleration.Catriona Mckinnon - 2002 - Mind 111 (441):156-158.
  • Legalising Toleration: a Reply to Balint. [REVIEW]Peter Jones - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (3):265-270.
    Abstract I re-present my account of how a liberal democratic society can be tolerant and do so in a way designed to meet Peter Balint’s objections. In particular, I explain how toleration can be approached from a third-party perspective, which is that of neither tolerator nor tolerated but of rule-makers providing for the toleration that the citizens of a society are to extend to one another. Constructing a regime of toleration should not be confused with engaging in toleration. Negative appraisal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations