What do players do in a game? A Habermasian perspective

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (3):311-328 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By adopting Habermas’ communicative theory, this paper categorizes players’ actions into four elements. The strategic action involves players manipulating each other within the framework of a gameFootnote1; normative action is manifested in following the rules and the underlying ethos; dramaturgical action emerges through the players’ deliberate presentation of themselves to both participants and spectators; and communicative action reveals the purpose of a game as a way of being. The conceptualization of game actions leads to a qualitative redefinition of the perfect game, which enables a greater understanding of the game, its participants, and human excellence. As such, this paper’s significance lies in the proposal that the Habermasian perfect game is a potential solution to Suits’ puzzle about what type of games can be played in his Utopia.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-17

Downloads
13 (#1,041,284)

6 months
11 (#340,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Edgar
Cardiff University
Emily Ryall
University of Gloucestershire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations