Spinoza, Adam Bede, Knowledge, and Sympathy: A Reply to Atkins

Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):424-440 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper joins the conversation on the relationship between Spinoza and George Eliot. After critically examining Atkins’s claim that the novels of George Eliot, as exemplified by Adam Bede, are a presentation of Spinoza’s philosophy stripped of the geometrical method, the paper explores Eliot’s philosophical engagement with Spinoza’s views on sympathy and the imagination. Thus, Eliot is read as a philosopher engaging with the arguments of Spinoza, rather than as someone representing his views in novel form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adam Smith and the possibility of sympathy with nature.Patrick R. Frierson - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):442–480.
Towards an ethics of sympathy: A legacy of Max Scheler.Aleksandar Fatic - 2013 - In Gary Peters & Fiona Peters (eds.), Thoughts of Love. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Adam Smith and the limits of sympathy.Duncan Kelly - 2013 - In Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli & Craig Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford University Press. pp. 201.
Relaxing a Tension in Adam Smith's Account of Sympathy.John W. McHugh - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2):189-204.
Taking Sympathy Seriously.John A. Fischer - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (3):197-215.
Being 'other-directed': A reply to Atkins.Yotam Benziman - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):325-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
18 (#832,892)

6 months
5 (#639,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Zenzinger
Regis College

Citations of this work

The fragility of rationality: George Eliot on akrasia and the law of consequences.Patrick Fessenbecker - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (2):275-291.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references