- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reciprocity and the Quest for Meaningful Disclosure
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):36-38 (2019)
Abstract
Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2019, Page 36-38.My notes
Similar books and articles
What Is Adequate Understanding?Gopal Sreenivasan - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):38-40.
Informed Consent Requires Understanding: Complete Disclosure Is Not Enough.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):27-28.
Ignorance Isn’t Bliss: Retaining a Meaningful Comprehension Requirement for Consent to Research.Paul S. Appelbaum - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):22-24.
Understanding as an Ethical Aspiration in an Era of Digital Technology-Based Communication: An Analysis of Informed Consent Functions.Stephanie A. Kraft, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):34-36.
Let Us Not Take the Ethics Out of Innovative Practice: A Case Against Institutional Review.Eline M. Bunnik - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (6):36-38.
Nudges and Budges.Karoly Majtenyi & Matthew Ruble - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):72-74.
Understanding (in) Consent for Governance.Michael A. Lensink, Sarah N. Boers, Karin R. Jongsma & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):43-45.
Are Corporations Nudging the Nudgers?Jonathan H. Marks - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):70-72.
Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966.Sarah Wieten, Jacob Blythe & David Magnus - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):3-5.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-09
Downloads
29 (#538,486)
6 months
9 (#436,568)
2019-05-09
Downloads
29 (#538,486)
6 months
9 (#436,568)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
From “Informed” to “Engaged” Consent: Risks and Obligations in Consent for Participation in a Health Data Repository.Elizabeth Bromley, Alexandra Mendoza-Graf, Sandra Berry, Camille Nebeker & Dmitry Khodyakov - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):172-182.
What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study.Madeleine J. Murtagh, Mwenza Blell, Andrew Turner, Joel T. Minion & Cynthia A. Ochieng - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.
Return of Results in Population Studies: How Do Participants Perceive Them?Hélène Nobile, Pascal Borry, Jennifer Moldenhauer & Manuela M. Bergmann - 2021 - Public Health Ethics 14 (1):12-22.
References found in this work
Exploring Understanding of “Understanding”: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension.Laura M. Beskow & Kevin P. Weinfurt - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):6-18.
Comprehension and Choice Under the Revised Common Rule: Improving Informed Consent by Offering Reasons Why Some Enroll in Research and Others Do Not.Benjamin S. Wilfond, Seema K. Shah, Kathryn M. Porter & Stephanie A. Kraft - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):53-55.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo