Could auditing standards be based on society's values?

Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1185-1200 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the criticisms directed at the accounting profession is that auditing and accounting standards are subjective in nature and do not represent the society's widespread interests and values. This paper examines whether a general consensus exists regarding the significance of incorporating society's values into auditing standards. The examination revealed the lack of such general agreement and further indicated that the perceptual differences are subjective in nature and not influenced by the participant's qualifications, income, experience, gender or marital status.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Auditing and Ethical Knowledge.Craig Mackenzie - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1395 - 1402.
Balancing performance, ethics, and accountability.Simon Zadek - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1421-1442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#98,306)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Business ethics auditing – more than a stakeholder's toy.John Rosthorn - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):9 - 19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references