The Constraining Influence of the Revolutionary on the Growth of the Field

Axiomathes 32 (6):1339-1373 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article draws attention to a pattern of development within science and other intellectual research communities that has received virtually no mention. We propose that subsequent dominance of a research community by a figure responsible for significant innovation often delays progress in the field. During the period in which the revolutionary continues to influence research in a community, far too frequently the effect is to freeze progress within the limited directions which the revolutionary sanctions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lenin Studies: Method and Organisation.Paul Le Blanc - 2017 - Historical Materialism 25 (4):105-138.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Maxwell’s Field and Whitehead’s Events: The Adventure of a Revolutionary Idea.Leemon McHenry - 2007 - In Pierfrancisco Basile & Michel Weber (eds.), Subjectivity, Process and Rationality. Frankfurt, Germany: pp. 177-189.
Rousseau and the French Revolution, 1762-1791.Joan McDonald - 1965 - [London]: University of London, Athlone Press.
The Art of Revolutionary Praxis.Duane H. Davis - 2021 - Sartre Studies International 27 (1):76-98.
Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?Stephen Toulmin - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 39--47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-20

Downloads
16 (#903,096)

6 months
11 (#233,459)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, Roger C. Buck & Robert S. Cohen - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266-274.
Charles Darwin: The Man and his Influence.Peter J. Bowler & Thomas Junker - 1997 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 19 (3).

View all 9 references / Add more references