Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?

In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 39--47 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The structure of science and a drop of water.Benedetto A. Soldano - 1960 - [n.p.,:
Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.Deborah G. Mayo - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):271-290.
H2O, 'water', and transparent reduction.Thomas W. Polger - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):109-130.
The purpose and place of formal systems in the development of science.Bruce Edmonds - manuscript
Kuhn and His Critics on Normal and Revolutionary Science.Joseph LaLumia - 1991 - Diogenes 39 (154):39-45.
The reception of Newton's gravitational theory by huygens, varignon, and maupertuis: How normal science may be revolutionary.Koffi Maglo - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):135-169.
Is water a mixure?: bridging the distinction between physical and chemical properties.Paul Needham - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):66-77.
Looks as powers.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):221-52.
Normal science and the extension of theories.Jack C. Carloye - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):241-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
149 (#122,736)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1287-1313.
The philosophy of alternative logics.Andrew Aberdein & Stephen Read - 2011 - In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The development of modern logic. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 613-723.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references