The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical Questioning

&
Social Epistemology 35 (4):379-392 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of field philosophy challenges a common self-understanding in Western philosophy. One question regarding this challenge is the extent to which it might be relevant to a philosophical an...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02691728.2020.1752842

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Challenges of Medical Ethics in China: Are Gene-Edited Babies Enough?Zeng Jie Ye, Xiao Ying Zhang, Jian Liang & Ying Tang - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):123-125.
Affected Genome Editing Crops: The Consequences of Genome-Edited Babies in China.Hao Li & San Yin - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1847-1850.
Carl Schmitt in China.Q. Zheng - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (160):29-52.
Heidegger and Derrida on the Nature of Questioning: Towards the Rehabilitation of Questioning in Contemporary Philosophy.Vincent Blok - 2015 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 46 (4):307-322.
Boston review.Alex Byrne - unknown
Should Parents Design Their Children’s Genome: Some General Arguments and a Confucian Solution.Jianhui Li & Xin Zhang - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (3):43.
Conflict of Interest in Scientific Research in China: A Socio-ethical Analysis of He Jiankui’s Human Genome-editing Experiment.Jing-Bao Nie, Guangkuan Xie, Hua Chen & Yali Cong - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):191-201.
The Regulation of Genome Editing Technologies and New Methods of Germline Interventions in China.Li Jiang - 2019 - In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 83-97.
The 'warrior Gene' and the mãori people: The responsibility of the Geneticists.Laurence Perbal - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (7):382-387.
The Philosophical Challenge from China, edited by Bruya, Brian: Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2015, pp. xxxi + 393, US$45. [REVIEW]John Ramsey - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):820-823.
Higher Education as a Field of Study in China: Defining Knowledge and Curriculum Structure.Xin Wang - 2010 - Lexington Books.
Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory' by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]Maria Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
Controversy over “Jullien,” or where and what is China, Philosophically Speaking?Ralph Weber - 2014 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (3-4):361-377.
The Theoretic Doctrine in the Culture Controversy in Modern China.Zhen-wu Lin - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 3:75-79.
Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the 'CRISPR babies' experiment?Donna Dickenson & Marcy Darnovsky - 2019 - Nature Biotechnology 27:350-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-02

Downloads
25 (#630,588)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references