Review of Metaphysics 65 (4):747-764 (2012)

This paper explores Plato and Aristotle 's responses to the pre-Socratic philosopher Parmenides, who paradoxically said that there is no such thing as non-being, and no such things as change. I argue that Plato’s response would have been good enough to defeat the claim in a debate, thereby remedying the political aspects of the Parmenides problem. However, Aristotle ’s answer is required to answer some additional philosophical and scientific aspects. Plato's Sophist is a very difficult dialogue to understand; seeing it in light of Aristotle 's discussion of the same topic helps to explain the complexities of what his teacher Plato wrote
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph2012654140
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Analogy and Being.Gregory Westenberg - 2017 - Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (3):305-311.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Recent Interpretations of Plato's Parmenides.Egil A. Wylter - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Plato's Parmenides.Samuel C. Rickless - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP index

Total views
158 ( #69,683 of 2,462,587 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,700 of 2,462,587 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes