The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology

Cognitive Linguistics 32 (4):641-670 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The distinction between abstract and concrete concepts is fundamental to cognitive linguistics and cognitive science. This distinction is commonly operationalized through concreteness ratings based on the aggregated judgments of many people. What is often overlooked in experimental studies using this operationalization is that ratings are attributed to words, not to concepts directly. In this paper we explore the relationship between the linguistic properties of English words and conceptual abstractness/concreteness. Based on hypotheses stated in the existing linguistic literature we select a set of variables and verify whether they are statistically associated with concreteness ratings. We show that English nouns are rated as more concrete compared to other parts of speech, but mass nouns are rated as less concrete than count nouns. Furthermore, a more complex morphological structure is associated with abstractness, and as for etymology, French- and Latin-derived words are more abstract than words of other origin. This shows that linguistic properties of words are indeed associated with the degree of concreteness that we attribute to the underlying concepts, and we discuss the implications that these findings have for linguistic theory and for empirical investigations in the cognitive sciences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Are Abstract Concepts? On Lexical Ambiguity and Concreteness Ratings.Guido Löhr - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (3):549-566.
Lexical Concepts as Fluctuating Structures.Alyona Budnikova - 2019 - Studia Semiotyczne 33 (1):135-153.
Neoclassical Concepts.Derek Leben - 2015 - Mind and Language 30 (1):44-69.
The structure of lexical concepts.Ken Daley - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):349 - 372.
Composite Objects and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:215-238.
Creating Legal Terms: A Linguistic Perspective. [REVIEW]Pius ten Hacken - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):407-425.
Précis of Conjoining Meanings.Paul M. Pietroski - 2020 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):271-282.


Added to PP

27 (#569,578)

6 months
14 (#167,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Language.Edward Sapir - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Ronald W. Langacker - 1983 - Indiana University Linguistics Club.

View all 23 references / Add more references