Philosophy and science

Philosophy of Science 9 (1):1-18 (1942)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many centuries ago, at the very beginning of the systematic development of philosophy, Plato declared that the thinker's domain comprises “the wholeness of things;” and indeed, the earlier thinkers took all knowledge for their province and did not hesitate to discuss problems now referred to art, psychology, economics, mathematics, or physics. Since then the meaning of philosophy has appreciably changed, however, and the intellectual descendants of the great founder of the Academy no longer claim the monopoly of all fields of study. For there appeared in the meantime a mighty competitor—or should we say a partner?—in the pursuit of truth, namely, science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Mind and nature.Ralph B. Winn - 1946 - Philosophy of Science 13 (1):41-52.
The nature of causation.Ralph B. Winn - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (2):192-204.
Dialectics: General Principles.Ralph B. Winn - 1938 - Science and Society 2 (4):520 - 526.
Science today: problem or crisis?Ralph Levinson & Jeff Thomas (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
Philosophy of science and historical enquiry.John Losee - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is nature rational?Ralph B. Winn - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (3):285-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
16 (#905,800)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references