Review [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):331-334 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russell once compared a good notation to a good teacher. Whatever can be said in a good notation can be said in a bad one, just as whatever can be said by a good teacher can be said by a bad one; the difference is that the good notation and the good teacher help one discover more for oneself. It has gradually emerged that the language of modal logic constitutes a good notation for the study of formal provability. That application of modal logic is the subject of George Boolos' welcome new book.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):110 - 116.
Logics of Provability. [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):110 - 116.
Review: Harry Ruja, Good Logics and Bad. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):81-81.
Well-Being and Value.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 1992 - Utilitas 4 (1):1.
Babbage's guidelines for the design of mathematical notations.Dirk Schlimm & Jonah Dutz - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1 (88):92–101.
Review: Development and Reasons. [REVIEW]Mark LeBar - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):711 - 719.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-05

Downloads
17 (#863,839)

6 months
6 (#700,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references