Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge [Book Review]

Abstract

In this book, Stephen Hetherington attacks what he thinks are two "dogmas" of epistemology. One he calls "epistemic absolutism" which amounts to the claim that knowledge is absolute: you can be with or without it, but once you have it, it is not possible to have more or less. The other is "justificationalism" which is the view that some sort of justification is necessary for knowledge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology-Stephen Hetherington.Bruce W. Brower - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1; ISSU 173):107-107.
The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge.John Greco - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69.
Rethinking Knowledge.Carlo Cellucci - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (2):213-234.
Knowledge and evidence.Paul K. Moser - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Epistemic Normativity and the Intrinsic Value of Knowledge.William Gordon Snow - 1995 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-19

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik J. Olsson
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references