Individual and family decisions about organ donation

Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):26–40 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

abstract This paper examines, from a philosophical point of view, the ethics of the role of the family and the deceased in decisions about organ retrieval. The paper asks: Who, out of the individual and the family, should have the ultimate power to donate or withhold organs? On the side of respecting the wishes of the deceased individual, the paper considers and rejects arguments by analogy with bequest and from posthumous bodily integrity. It develops an argument for posthumous autonomy based on the liberal idea of self‐development and argues that this establishes a right of veto over donation. It claims, however, that whether the family's power to veto would conflict with posthumous autonomy rights depends on how it comes about. On the side of respecting the family's wishes, the paper first considers an argument from family distress. This supports a contingent, non‐rights‐based reason for the family's power that is trumped by the deceased's rights. It then outlines and criticises an argument based on family autonomy. The conclusion is that the individual has the right to veto the family's wish to donate and that, while the family has no right to veto the individual's wishes to donate, it can legitimately acquire this power and has done so in practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organ Donation by Capital Prisoners in China: Reflections in Confucian Ethics.M. Wang & X. Wang - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):197-212.
Sharing our body and blood: Organ donation and feminist critiques of sacrifice.Ann Mongoven - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):89 – 114.
Gender imbalance in living organ donation.Nikola Biller-Andorno - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):199-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#225,106)

6 months
8 (#411,508)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Organ procurement: dead interests, living needs.John Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):130-134.
The failure to give: Reducing barriers to organ donation.James F. Childress - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):1-16.
Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs?W. Glannon - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):153-156.
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.

Add more references