Describing God

In Robert Pasnau (ed.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 749-760 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The philosophical problem of describing God arises at the intersection of two different areas of inquiry. The word ‘describing’ makes it clear that the issue is in part a logical one – in the broad medieval sense of ‘logic,’ which includes semantics, the philosophy of language, and even some aspects of the theory of cognition. It is the problem, first, of forming an understanding of some extramental object and, second, of conveying that understanding by means of verbal signs. But the word ‘God’ also indicates that the logical problems involved in description are exacerbated, or perhaps that new problems arise, because of the nature of the extramental object that we are seeking to describe. Given the enormous ingenuity with which logical problems were debated in the Middle Ages, it is not surprising that the problem of describing God would be worked out in detail – and that many thinkers would lose sight of the specifically theological context in which the problem was ostensibly set. We see here a familiar phenomenon. Once philosophers (even scholastic philosophers) have fully domesticated a problem, discussions of the problem seldom lay bare the practical urgency that alone made the question worth pursuing in the first place; it becomes a technical question, answerable by technical means. Yet, though it is not always in evidence, the practical upshot of the issue is never entirely forgotten, as John Duns Scotus reminds us in his curt dismissal of the view that we can at best say of God what he is not: “We do not have supreme love for negations” (Ordinatio I.3.1.1–2 n. 10). Attempts to resolve the problem of describing God are ultimately efforts to “save the appearances”: to accommodate within a philosophically defensible framework both the data of what are taken to be divinely revealed texts and the linguistic practices of believers. The appearances to be saved of course differ somewhat from one religious tradition to another. The Christian tradition, for example, faces distinctive problems that arise in understanding and describing....

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Charles Hartshorne on describing God.Santiago Sia - 1987 - Modern Theology 3 (2):193-203.
The myth of religious experience.Nick Zangwill - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (1):1-22.
Taking the Nature of God Seriously.Nicholas Maxwell - 2013 - In Asa Kasher & Jeanine Diller (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
D. Z. Phillips' problems with evil and with God.William Hasker - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):151 - 160.
God the problem.Gordon D. Kaufman - 1972 - Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press.
God and Man.Clement C. J. Webb - 1930 - Philosophy 5 (20):559-.
The Empirical Stance. [REVIEW]Paul O’Grady - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):870-872.
Problems of the Origin of Political Authority.Donald J. Kreitzer - 1960 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 10 (10):190-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-09

Downloads
89 (#196,196)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references