Reply to James Muir

Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (4):455-458 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to Muir's charge of ignorance about the history of philosophy of education and raises the question whether philosophy of education is a pure, autonomous discipline.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to James Muir.John White - 2004 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (4):455–458.
A reply to James Marshall.John Wilson - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 18 (1):105–107.
A Reply to James Marshall.John Wilson - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 18 (1):105-107.
Diasporic Philosophy, Counter-Education and Improvisation: A Reply.Ilan Gur-Ze’ev - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (5):381-386.
A reply to Raymond Godfrey.John White - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 18 (1):119–121.
The compulsory curriculum and beyond: A reply to Peter Gardner.John White - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 19 (1):129–136.
The Compulsory Curriculum and Beyond: a reply to Peter Gardner.John White - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 19 (1):129-136.
Ambivalent Education: Reply to Jeffrey Frank.Amia Srinivasan - 2023 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 42 (2):225-229.
Representation and Education: reply to McKenzie.Christopher Winch - 2002 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 34 (3):353-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
12 (#1,093,652)

6 months
4 (#1,005,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references