In Defence of State-Controlled Curricula

Journal of Philosophy of Education 15 (2):255-259 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A defence, against Scott Carson and Robert Dearden, that schools' curricula should be set by the state and no longer, as in England and Wales, by schools and teachers themselves

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defence of state-controlled curricula.John White - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 15 (2):255–259.
Contagious disease and self-defence.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):339-359.
Ethics and MIS Education.Richard J. McGowan - 1996 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (3):12-17.
Autonomy and the Free Speech Principle.Susan Easton - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):27-39.
Education and the modern state.Anthony O'Hear - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):322-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
13 (#1,020,434)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Education and Politics.R. F. Dearden - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 14 (2):149-156.
John white on state control of the curriculum [1].Scott Carson - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 12 (1):63–68.
Education and politics.R. F. Dearden - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 14 (2):149–156.

Add more references