A Neglected Ethical Issue in Citizen Science and DIY Biology

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):46-48 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Andrea Wiggins and John Wilbanks’ article (2019) presents us with a welcome overview of the neglected, novel ethical issues raised by the advent of citizen science in health and biomedical contexts. This contribution takes a rather different approach, focusing on a very specific (yet also overlooked) problem in this context - the ethical implications of self-administered genetic testing. This problem, however, is particularly illustrative of the “ethics gap” between traditional medical settings and new public-driven scientific practices, emphasized by Wiggins and Wilbanks in their more wide-ranging treatment.

Similar books and articles

The concept of European citizen.Milorad Stupar - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (31):9-27.
Neural Devices: New Ethics?Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (6):2-2.
Transcendental niche construction.Werner Callebaut - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):73-90.
Editors' Introduction to the Special Issue.Nigel Paneth & Michael J. Joyner - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (4):467-471.
Citizen science: are people distinguishable from bacteria?Sergei Yu Shevchenko - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):171-183.
The Politics of Anti-Creationism: The Committees of Correspondence. [REVIEW]Hee-Joo Park - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):349 - 370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-25

Downloads
308 (#63,221)

6 months
71 (#61,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lucie White
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations