Medical Indemnity Reform in Australia: "First Do No Harm"

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):429-443 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical indemnity is not usually the stuff of high political and social drama in Australia. When the biggest medical defense organization went into voluntary liquidation in 2002, this all changed. Newspapers carried stories on an almost daily basis about the actual or possible negative impact of the “crisis” on doctors, hospitals, and communities. Doctors became increasingly vocal in their criticisms and expansive in their claims. Their political organization, the Australian Medical Association, lobbied powerfully and successfully for government intervention to address the problem of dramatically escalating premiums for some doctors. This, combined with a broader public relations campaign about public liability insurance, resulted in significant changes in the law at both the federal and state level - not just in the area of medical negligence but in relation to most personal injury litigation.The genesis of and reasons for current medical indemnity problems in Australia have been the subject of much speculation and little rigorous analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Shall Live?: Health, Economics and Social Choice.Victor R. Fuchs - 2011 - New Jersey: World Scientific. Edited by Karen Eggleston.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
First Do No Harm: Critical Analyses of the Roads to Health Care Reform.A. S. Iltis & M. J. Cherry - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (5):403-415.
Medical ethics at Notre Dame: The J. Philip Clarke Family lectures, 1988-1999.Margaret Monahan Hogan & David Solomon (eds.) - 2007 - [South Bend, Ind.?]: The Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture.
On not Harming: Two traditions.Barbara MacKinnon - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (3):313-328.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
After harm: medical error and the ethics of forgiveness.Nancy Berlinger - 2005 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Why “do no harm”?Virginia A. Sharpe - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):197-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
14 (#985,798)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiona Wheatland
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references