A randomness‐based theodicy for evolutionary evils

Zygon 52 (4):984-1004 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We develop and knit together several theodicies in order to find a more complete picture of why certain forms of animal suffering might be permitted by a perfect being. We focus on an especially potent form of the problem of evil, which arises from considering why a perfectly good, wise, and powerful God might use evolutionary mechanisms that predictably result in so much animal suffering and loss of life. There are many existing theodicies on the market, and although they offer helpful resources, we combine and further develop several proposals to produce a composite theodicy that avoids certain shortcomings of the individual theodicies. An important element of our project is locating a role for randomness in cosmic and biological evolution. In particular, we show how randomness might enhance or enable certain goods, including everlasting goods, at the risk of temporary evils.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-27

Downloads
139 (#132,517)

6 months
16 (#218,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Rasmussen
Azusa Pacific University

References found in this work

Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.George Bealer - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 71-125.
Modal epistemology.Peter Van Inwagen - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (1):67--84.
Modal Epistemology.E. Weber & T. DeMey (eds.) - 2004 - Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgie vor Wetenschappen en Kunsten.
Family History.J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (3):357-378.
Nature red in tooth and claw: theism and the problem of animal suffering.Michael J. Murray - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):173-177.

View all 9 references / Add more references