Research Ethics 11 (1):52-60 (2015)

Owing to unique features of their design, cluster randomized trials complicate the interpretation of standard ethics guidelines. The recently published Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials provides researchers and research ethics committees with detailed guidance on the design, conduct, and review of cluster trials. The Ottawa statement sets out 15 recommendations, including guidance on the justification of study design, the need for research ethics committee review, the identification of research participants, obtaining informed consent, the role of gatekeepers in protecting cluster interests, the assessment of benefits and harms, and the protection of vulnerable participants.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1747016114531980
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials.Suezann Puffer, David J. Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (5):479-483.
Ethical Challenges in Implementation Research.R. Macklin - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (1):86-93.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #1,013,600 of 2,533,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes